EVE Search - James 315 - An Apology and an Appeal

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

James 315 - An Apology and an Appeal

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 982	Posted - 2013.02.14 21:54:00 - [1] - Quote I have two characters, both of whom live hi-sec, but I sure as hell do not consider myself a hi-sec player.... Sorry, Mynnna, I could not resist. Your post just made me smile. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 982	Posted - 2013.02.15 08:02:00 - [2] - Quote That the vast majority of miners play the game within CCP's rules, whist accepting that they can be ganked at any time is unacceptable. Tough guy pvpers should come to the forums and whine about this until CCP end mining as part of the game. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 983	Posted - 2013.02.15 12:47:00 - [3] - Quote TheGunslinger42 wrote: lmao at approximately three out of every four posts being either goonspiracy garbage, claiming anyone who even partly agrees with James an alt, or whining about PVPers in a game that is 99% PVP. The problem some pvpers have, is simply accepting the fact that the overwhelming majority of miners accept that they can be ganked anywhere anytime, and simply regard it as part of their business costs. Mind you, perhaps for some pvpers, tough guy posting about a virtually non-existent issue is a part of their tough guy self-image in the game. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 984	Posted - 2013.02.15 15:31:00 - [4] - Quote Lord Ovuld Feish wrote: Fighting for a risk-free high sec is a worthy cause, carebears! All the hardcore neckbeards will have their lowsec and nullsec, and if we don't want part of that risk, well, that's not our problem. Maybe if they stop blueing each other, they'd get the fights they're looking for. FIGHTING FOR A THEMEPARK EVE! ^^ Hopeless trolling. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 984	Posted - 2013.02.15 18:16:00 - [5] - Quote Lord Ovuld Feish wrote: Vin King wrote: Lord Ovuld Feish wrote: Vin King wrote: Lord Ovuld Feish wrote: Now what? That's easy. Stop whining and demanding that the ship you're not even playing is still there when you bother to come back to the game. Hurr durr I like putting words in other players' mouths. FTFY I see you accurately quoted yourself in that. Thanks! No problem. Now kindly taste my anus. You should take a break from posting for a while. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 984	Posted - 2013.02.15 18:29:00 - [6] - Quote Hi Nicolo, it seems to me that your problem has an inbuilt solution. If the NPC folk you harp on about constantly, get bored as you assume they will, then they will leave, as you say in your post above mine. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 984	Posted - 2013.02.15 18:44:00 - [7] - Quote Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: I thought it was quite useful in seperating the intelligent people (knowledgeable idealists who support James 315) from the unthinking degenerates, effeminately ruled by their emotions and unable to even read more then a paragraph before their simian forebrains began to shut down (themepark lobbyists). Hey! let it all out man, you will feel better afterwards. Also, glad to see that your well thought out, dispassionate, logical posts on the issue of NPC folk are not influenced by any 'effeminate emotions' This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 984	Posted - 2013.02.16 11:47:00 - [8] - Quote TheGunslinger42 wrote: Lord Ovuld Feish wrote: The fact of the matter is that catering to carebears is more profitable. If CCP wants more money, they'll stop the carebear hate, or at least stop us from getting bullied. Got any proof of that, mate? Look at all the other MMOs that cater to carebears and follow the wow-trend: They're wastelands after the initial bubble bursts. SWTOR had to go Free to Play after a ridiculously short time it was so abysmal, and that was one of the new MMOs that had the best chance at succeeding (franchise recognition, the team behind it, the massive resources available to them, etc) Conversely, we have ten straight years of evidence suggesting that catering to the be-an-*******-in-a-sandbox crowd works just fine, and the occasional blip along the way have been a result of NOT focusing on things for that crowd (eg incarna) Lord whatever is trolling. Please ignore him. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 986	Posted - 2013.02.16 20:03:00 - [9] - Quote Lord Ovuld Feish wrote: Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Lord Ovuld Feish wrote: ahem SANDBOX. Meaning multiple styles of play, including solo ones. Sandbox means that you can try and play solo, it doesn't mean we have to let you. Indeed. And being forced to interact is something that needs to change. ^^^ yet more silly trolling. Please stop. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 987	Posted - 2013.02.16 23:06:00 - [10] - Quote Lord Ovuld Feish wrote: I disagree. I think there should be areas of New Eden where you can play your way without prowling dicks looking for more tears for a substandard blog. There are, they are called 'stations' This is not a signature.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.